linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/267] 4.14.159-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Dec 2019 08:53:22 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        william.kucharski@...cle.com, bepvte@...il.com, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, rientjes@...gle.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/267] 4.14.159-stable review

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 09:52:19AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions on arm and qemu_arm.
> 
> Regressions (compared to build v4.14.158)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> x15:
>   ltp-fs-tests:
>     * proc01
> 
> qemu_arm:
>   libhugetlbfs:
>     * HUGETLB_SHM_yes-shmoverride_linked-2M-32
>     * LD_PRELOAD_libhugetlbfs.so-HUGETLB_SHM_yes-shmoverride_unlinked-2M-32
>     * counters.sh-2M-32
>     * truncate_sigbus_versus_oom-2M-32
> 
>   ltp-fs-tests:
>     * proc01

What does all of this mean?

Can you bisect to find the offending patch?

thanks,

greg k-h