[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <102e71da-8b9c-8528-3bec-b4a22895fb44@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 07:59:34 +0000
From: <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com>
To: <peter.ujfalusi@...com>, <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: <vkoul@...nel.org>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: at91: Use dma_request_chan() instead
dma_request_slave_channel()
On 17.12.2019 09:50, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> dma_request_slave_channel() is a wrapper on top of dma_request_chan()
> eating up the error code.
>
> By using dma_request_chan() directly the driver can support deferred
> probing against DMA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Hi Peter,
Thank you for the patch.
Nitpick : at91 is another driver (old one for different platforms), so
can you please change the commit oneline to iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc:
to not be confused about which driver is affected.
Thanks !
Eugen
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> index e1850f3d5cf3..a5c7771227d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> @@ -1444,10 +1444,10 @@ static void at91_adc_dma_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (st->dma_st.dma_chan)
> return;
>
> - st->dma_st.dma_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(&pdev->dev, "rx");
> -
> - if (!st->dma_st.dma_chan) {
> + st->dma_st.dma_chan = dma_request_chan(&pdev->dev, "rx");
> + if (IS_ERR(st->dma_st.dma_chan)) {
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "can't get DMA channel\n");
> + st->dma_st.dma_chan = NULL;
> goto dma_exit;
> }
>
> --
> Peter
>
> Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
> Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists