linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: ufs-qcom: Add reset control support for host controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191217092433.GN2536@vkoul-mobl>
Date:   Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:54:33 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     cang@...eaurora.org
Cc:     Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        nguyenb@...eaurora.org, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: ufs-qcom: Add reset control support for
 host controller

Hi Can,

On 17-12-19, 15:10, cang@...eaurora.org wrote:
> On 2019-12-17 12:13, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > Hi Can,
> > 
> > On 17-12-19, 08:37, cang@...eaurora.org wrote:
> > > On 2019-12-17 03:12, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:05 PM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Can,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 14-11-19, 22:09, Can Guo wrote:
> > > > > > Add reset control for host controller so that host controller can be reset
> > > > > > as required in its power up sequence.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am seeing a regression on UFS on SM8150-mtp with this patch. I think
> > > > > Jeff is seeing same one lenove laptop on 8998.
> > > >
> > > > Confirmed.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 845 does not seem to have this issue and only thing I can see is
> > > > > that on
> > > > > sm8150 and 8998 we define reset as:
> > > > >
> > > > >                         resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_BCR>;
> > > > >                         reset-names = "rst";
> > > > >
> > > 
> > > Hi Jeffrey and Vinod,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for reporting this. May I know what kind of regression do you
> > > see on
> > > 8150 and 8998?
> > > BTW, do you have reset control for UFS PHY in your DT?
> > > See 71278b058a9f8752e51030e363b7a7306938f64e.
> > > 
> > > FYI, we use reset control on all of our platforms and it is
> > > a must during our power up sequence.
> > 
> > Yes we do have this and additionally both the DTS describe a 'rst' reset
> > and this patch tries to use this.
> > 
> > Can you please tell me which platform this was tested on how the reset
> > was described in DT
> > 
> > Thanks
> 
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> If you are using the 8998's DT present on upstream, you may also need to
> enable
> device reset on your platform. (We usually do a device reset before call
> ufshcd_hba_enable())
> Given that 845 works fine, it may be the difference you have with 845. 845
> has device
> reset support ready in upstream code, you can check sdm845-mtp.dts.
> It is same for 8150, which is a lack of device reset support in upstream
> code base.

I am using 8150mtp and you can see the DTS at [1]
with this patch I get phy timeout error

[    2.532594] qcom-qmp-phy 1d87000.phy: phy initialization timed-out

If i revert this patch the Timeout goes away. UFS node for this platform
is enabled in [2] and [3]

I did add the GPIO as well for testing but that doesnt work, only thing
that makes it work is rename the reset line to something other that 'rst'

I found that with this patch the reset is invoked twice, not sure why!

The 845 does not define a reset 'rst' but both 8150 and 8998 define
that!

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git/log/?h=for-next
[2]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=3834a2e92229ef26d30de28acb698b2b23d3e397
[3]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=3e5bf28d2c3981f949e848eec8a60e0b9b61189d
> 
> To enable UFS device reset, please see
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20190828191756.24312-4-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org/
> 2. 53a5372ce326116f3e3d3f1d701113b2542509f4

Yes both are added for UFS and I am testing with these..
> 
> FYI, I tested the patch on 8250 and its family platforms. In my build, I
> ported
> change in #2 to my code base (in your case, make change to
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm8998.c) and enable the GPIO in DT like
> sdm845-mtp.dts

Please see drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8150.c upstream

>         reset-gpios = <&tlmm 150 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;

Yup, added:

        reset-gpios = <&tlmm 175 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;

-- 
~Vinod