[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4f7cbd8653e4e8eba5405b533c13469@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:05:57 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Steven Rostedt' <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: 'Tom Zanussi' <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ckframe.org>,
"linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: ftrace histogram sorting broken on BE architecures
From: Steven Rostedt
> Sent: 16 December 2019 18:29
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:06:50 +0000
> David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> wrote:
>
> > > Where original_val_a could be a byte, short, int, long or long long.
> >
> > I'd sort of guessed that, but then the pointer type passed to tracing_map_cmp_##type()
> > will always be 'u64 *' (since the field the address is taken of must be that type).
> > Then the (u64 *) casts are no longer needed.
> >
> > Possibly you can just pass the u64 values to:
> > tracing_map_cmp_##type(type a, type b)
> > {
> > return a > b ? 1 : a < b ? -1 : 0;
> > }
> >
> > The high bit masking and sign extension is then implicit in the call.
>
> But these are used to pass into a compare function that takes compare
> functions that are something other than numbers. They can be pointers
> to strings.
In that case I think I'd embed the u64 inside a structure and pass the structure
address to the compare function.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists