lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1576543535.24713784@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:47:10 +0000
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
        "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Vince Weaver" <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
        "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>,
        "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Stephane Eranian" <eranian@...gle.com>,
        "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...nel.org>,
        "Kim Phillips" <kim.phillips@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 096/136] perf/x86/amd/ibs: Handle erratum #420 only
 on the affected CPU family (10h)

3.16.80-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>

commit e431e79b60603079d269e0c2a5177943b95fa4b6 upstream.

This saves us writing the IBS control MSR twice when disabling the
event.

I searched revision guides for all families since 10h, and did not
find occurrence of erratum #420, nor anything remotely similar:
so we isolate the secondary MSR write to family 10h only.

Also unconditionally update the count mask for IBS Op implementations
that have read & writeable current count (CurCnt) fields in addition
to the MaxCnt field.  These bits were reserved on prior
implementations, and therefore shouldn't have negative impact.

Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Fixes: c9574fe0bdb9 ("perf/x86-ibs: Implement workaround for IBS erratum #420")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191023150955.30292-2-kim.phillips@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
 - Don't update the count mask; we don't use or define the CurCnt fields here
 - Adjust filename]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_ibs.c
@@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ static inline void perf_ibs_disable_even
 					  struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u64 config)
 {
 	config &= ~perf_ibs->cnt_mask;
-	wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, config);
+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10)
+		wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, config);
 	config &= ~perf_ibs->enable_mask;
 	wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, config);
 }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ