[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fab70737263a076ce6a853e9f554e190f3cfb883.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:06:02 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>
Cc: kjlu@....edu, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm/ppi: replace assertion code with recovery in
tpm_eval_dsm
On Sun, 2019-12-15 at 12:23 -0600, Aditya Pakki wrote:
> In tpm_eval_dsm, BUG_ON on ppi_handle is used as an assertion.
> By returning NULL to the callers, instead of crashing, the error
> can be better handled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists