linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/staging/exfat: Fix spelling mistakes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:11:09 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Julian Preis <julian.preis@....de>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
        Johannes Weidner <johannes.weidner@....de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/staging/exfat: Fix spelling mistakes

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 03:12:00PM +0100, Julian Preis wrote:
> Fix spelling mistakes in exfat_core.c and exfat_super.c.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Johannes Weidner <johannes.weidner@....de>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weidner <johannes.weidner@....de>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Preis <julian.preis@....de>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add email recipients according to get_maintainer.pl
> - Add patch versions
> - Use in-reply-to
> 
>  drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c  |  6 +++---
>  drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c | 10 +++++-----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> index d2d3447083c7..2c688cf91eac 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ static s32 __write_partial_entries_in_entry_set(struct super_block *sb,
>  	num_entries = count;
>  
>  	while (num_entries) {
> -		/* white per sector base */
> +		/* write per sector base */
>  		remaining_byte_in_sector = (1 << p_bd->sector_size_bits) - off;
>  		copy_entries = min_t(s32,
>  				     remaining_byte_in_sector >> DENTRY_SIZE_BITS,
> @@ -1392,7 +1392,7 @@ struct entry_set_cache_t *get_entry_set_in_dir(struct super_block *sb,
>  	while (num_entries) {
>  		/*
>  		 * instead of copying whole sector, we will check every entry.
> -		 * this will provide minimum stablity and consistency.
> +		 * this will provide minimum stability and consistency.
>  		 */
>  		entry_type = p_fs->fs_func->get_entry_type(ep);
>  
> @@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ static s32 extract_uni_name_from_name_entry(struct name_dentry_t *ep, u16 *unina
>  }
>  
>  /* return values of exfat_find_dir_entry()
> - * >= 0 : return dir entiry position with the name in dir
> + * >= 0 : return dir entry position with the name in dir
>   * -1 : (root dir, ".") it is the root dir itself
>   * -2 : entry with the name does not exist
>   */
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c
> index 6e481908c59f..02548335ec82 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c
> @@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static int ffsWriteFile(struct inode *inode, struct file_id_t *fid,
>  
>  	brelse(tmp_bh);
>  
> -	/* (3) update the direcoty entry */
> +	/* (3) update the directory entry */
>  	es = get_entry_set_in_dir(sb, &fid->dir, fid->entry,
>  				  ES_ALL_ENTRIES, &ep);
>  	if (!es)
> @@ -1481,7 +1481,7 @@ static int ffsReadStat(struct inode *inode, struct dir_entry_t *info)
>  
>  			count = count_dos_name_entries(sb, &dir, TYPE_DIR);
>  			if (count < 0) {
> -				ret = count; /* propogate error upward */
> +				ret = count; /* propagate error upward */
>  				goto out;
>  			}
>  			info->NumSubdirs = count;
> @@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@ static int ffsReadStat(struct inode *inode, struct dir_entry_t *info)
>  
>  		count = count_dos_name_entries(sb, &dir, TYPE_DIR);
>  		if (count < 0) {
> -			ret = count; /* propogate error upward */
> +			ret = count; /* propagate error upward */
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  		info->NumSubdirs += count;
> @@ -3689,7 +3689,7 @@ static int exfat_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * GFP_KERNEL is ok here, because while we do hold the
> -	 * supeblock lock, memory pressure can't call back into
> +	 * superblock lock, memory pressure can't call back into
>  	 * the filesystem, since we're only just about to mount
>  	 * it and have no inodes etc active!
>  	 */
> -- 
> 2.20.1

This patch does not apply to 5.5-rc2 at all.  Always work against the
latest linux-next release in order to not duplicate work that others
have done and give us a chance to apply patches to our development
trees.

thanks,

greg k-h