lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191218211231.GA918900@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:12:31 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] Consolidate dummy_con initialization

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 03:39:38PM -0500, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> This series moves initialization of conswitchp to dummy_con into vt.c,
> and configures DUMMY_CONSOLE unconditionally when CONFIG_VT is enabled.
> 
> The patches after the second one remove conswitchp = &dummy_con; from
> the various architecture setup functions where it currently appears. If
> the first two look ok, I was thinking of sending the others
> individually.
> 
> Arvind Sankar (24):
>   console/dummycon: Remove bogus depends on from DUMMY_CONSOLE
>   vt: Initialize conswitchp to dummy_con if unset
>   arch/setup: Drop dummy_con initialization
>   arch/setup: Drop dummy_con initialization

No two patches in a series should have the same subject line, let alone
20 of them.

Please fix up.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ