[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191218211231.GA918900@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:12:31 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] Consolidate dummy_con initialization
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 03:39:38PM -0500, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> This series moves initialization of conswitchp to dummy_con into vt.c,
> and configures DUMMY_CONSOLE unconditionally when CONFIG_VT is enabled.
>
> The patches after the second one remove conswitchp = &dummy_con; from
> the various architecture setup functions where it currently appears. If
> the first two look ok, I was thinking of sending the others
> individually.
>
> Arvind Sankar (24):
> console/dummycon: Remove bogus depends on from DUMMY_CONSOLE
> vt: Initialize conswitchp to dummy_con if unset
> arch/setup: Drop dummy_con initialization
> arch/setup: Drop dummy_con initialization
No two patches in a series should have the same subject line, let alone
20 of them.
Please fix up.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists