[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e11d2ea9-20f1-6920-7efc-ba8a50312f75@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:44:39 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
mperttunen@...dia.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com
Cc: pdeschrijver@...dia.com, pgaikwad@...dia.com, spujar@...dia.com,
josephl@...dia.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
mmaddireddy@...dia.com, markz@...dia.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/19] soc: tegra: Add Tegra PMC clock registrations
into PMC driver
18.12.2019 11:35, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 18.12.2019 11:30, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>> 17.12.2019 23:03, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>> Tegra PMC has clk_out_1, clk_out_2, and clk_out_3 clocks and currently
>>> these PMC clocks are registered by Tegra clock driver with each clock as
>>> separate mux and gate clocks using clk_register_mux and clk_register_gate
>>> by passing PMC base address and register offsets and PMC programming for
>>> these clocks happens through direct PMC access by the clock driver.
>>>
>>> With this, when PMC is in secure mode any direct PMC access from the
>>> non-secure world does not go through and these clocks will not be
>>> functional.
>>>
>>> This patch adds these PMC clocks registration to pmc driver with PMC as
>>> a clock provider and registers each clock as single clock.
>>>
>>> clk_ops callback implementations for these clocks uses tegra_pmc_readl and
>>> tegra_pmc_writel which supports PMC programming in both secure mode and
>>> non-secure mode.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 248 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 248 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>>> index ea0e11a09c12..6d65194a6e71 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>>> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
>>>
>>> #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>> +#include <linux/clkdev.h>
>>> +#include <linux/clk/clk-conf.h>
>>> #include <linux/clk/tegra.h>
>>> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>>> @@ -48,6 +51,7 @@
>>> #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra-io-pad.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/tegra186-gpio.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/tegra194-gpio.h>
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/soc/tegra-pmc.h>
>>>
>>> #define PMC_CNTRL 0x0
>>> #define PMC_CNTRL_INTR_POLARITY BIT(17) /* inverts INTR polarity */
>>> @@ -100,6 +104,7 @@
>>> #define PMC_WAKE2_STATUS 0x168
>>> #define PMC_SW_WAKE2_STATUS 0x16c
>>>
>>> +#define PMC_CLK_OUT_CNTRL 0x1a8
>>> #define PMC_SENSOR_CTRL 0x1b0
>>> #define PMC_SENSOR_CTRL_SCRATCH_WRITE BIT(2)
>>> #define PMC_SENSOR_CTRL_ENABLE_RST BIT(1)
>>> @@ -155,6 +160,64 @@
>>> #define TEGRA_SMC_PMC_READ 0xaa
>>> #define TEGRA_SMC_PMC_WRITE 0xbb
>>>
>>> +struct pmc_clk {
>>> + struct clk_hw hw;
>>> + unsigned long offs;
>>> + u32 mux_mask;
>>> + u32 mux_shift;
>>> + u32 gate_shift;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +#define to_pmc_clk(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct pmc_clk, hw)
>>> +
>>> +struct pmc_clk_init_data {
>>> + char *name;
>>> + const char *const *parents;
>>> + int num_parents;
>>> + int clk_id;
>>> + u8 mux_shift;
>>> + u8 gate_shift;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const char * const clk_out1_parents[] = { "osc", "osc_div2",
>>> + "osc_div4", "extern1",
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const char * const clk_out2_parents[] = { "osc", "osc_div2",
>>> + "osc_div4", "extern2",
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const char * const clk_out3_parents[] = { "osc", "osc_div2",
>>> + "osc_div4", "extern3",
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct pmc_clk_init_data tegra_pmc_clks_data[] = {
>>> + {
>>> + .name = "clk_out_1",
>>> + .parents = clk_out1_parents,
>>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(clk_out1_parents),
>>> + .clk_id = TEGRA_PMC_CLK_OUT_1,
>>
>>> + .mux_shift = 6,
>>> + .gate_shift = 2,
>>
>> I'd replace these with a single .shift, given that mux_shift =
>> gate_shift + 4 for all clocks.
>>
>>> + },
>>> + {
>>> + .name = "clk_out_2",
>>> + .parents = clk_out2_parents,
>>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(clk_out2_parents),
>>> + .clk_id = TEGRA_PMC_CLK_OUT_2,
>>> + .mux_shift = 14,
>>> + .gate_shift = 10,
>>> + },
>>> + {
>>> + .name = "clk_out_3",
>>> + .parents = clk_out3_parents,
>>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(clk_out3_parents),
>>> + .clk_id = TEGRA_PMC_CLK_OUT_3,
>>> + .mux_shift = 22,
>>> + .gate_shift = 18,
>>> + },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> struct tegra_powergate {
>>> struct generic_pm_domain genpd;
>>> struct tegra_pmc *pmc;
>>> @@ -254,6 +317,9 @@ struct tegra_pmc_soc {
>>> */
>>> const struct tegra_wake_event *wake_events;
>>> unsigned int num_wake_events;
>>> +
>>> + const struct pmc_clk_init_data *pmc_clks_data;
>>> + unsigned int num_pmc_clks;
>>> };
>>>
>>> static const char * const tegra186_reset_sources[] = {
>>> @@ -2163,6 +2229,173 @@ static int tegra_pmc_clk_notify_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>> return NOTIFY_OK;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void pmc_clk_fence_udelay(u32 offset)
>>> +{
>>> + tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, offset);
>>> + /* pmc clk propagation delay 2 us */
>>> + udelay(2);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static u8 pmc_clk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pmc_clk *clk = to_pmc_clk(hw);
>>> + u32 val;
>>> +
>>> + val = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, clk->offs) >> clk->mux_shift;
>>> + val &= clk->mux_mask;
>>> +
>>> + return val;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int pmc_clk_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pmc_clk *clk = to_pmc_clk(hw);
>>> + u32 val;
>>> +
>>> + val = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, clk->offs);
>>> + val &= ~(clk->mux_mask << clk->mux_shift);
>>> + val |= index << clk->mux_shift;
>>> + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, val, clk->offs);
>>> + pmc_clk_fence_udelay(clk->offs);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int pmc_clk_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pmc_clk *clk = to_pmc_clk(hw);
>>> +
>>> + return tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, clk->offs) & BIT(clk->gate_shift) ? 1 : 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void pmc_clk_set_state(unsigned long offs, u32 shift, int state)
>>> +{
>>> + u32 val;
>>> +
>>> + val = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, offs);
>>> + val = state ? (val | BIT(shift)) : (val & ~BIT(shift));
>>> + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, val, offs);
>>> + pmc_clk_fence_udelay(offs);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int pmc_clk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pmc_clk *clk = to_pmc_clk(hw);
>>> +
>>> + pmc_clk_set_state(clk->offs, clk->gate_shift, 1);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void pmc_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pmc_clk *clk = to_pmc_clk(hw);
>>> +
>>> + pmc_clk_set_state(clk->offs, clk->gate_shift, 0);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct clk_ops pmc_clk_ops = {
>>> + .get_parent = pmc_clk_mux_get_parent,
>>> + .set_parent = pmc_clk_mux_set_parent,
>>> + .determine_rate = __clk_mux_determine_rate,
>>> + .is_enabled = pmc_clk_is_enabled,
>>> + .enable = pmc_clk_enable,
>>> + .disable = pmc_clk_disable,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct clk *
>>> +tegra_pmc_clk_out_register(const struct pmc_clk_init_data *data,
>>> + unsigned long offset)
>>> +{
>>> + struct clk_init_data init;
>>> + struct pmc_clk *pmc_clk;
>>> +
>>> + pmc_clk = kzalloc(sizeof(*pmc_clk), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!pmc_clk)
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> +
>>> + init.name = data->name;
>>> + init.ops = &pmc_clk_ops;
>>> + init.parent_names = data->parents;
>>> + init.num_parents = data->num_parents;
>>> + init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT |
>>> + CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE;
>>> +
>>> + pmc_clk->hw.init = &init;
>>> + pmc_clk->offs = offset;
>>> + pmc_clk->mux_mask = 3;
>>
>> If mux_mask is a constant value, perhaps will be better to replace the
>> variable with a literal?
>>
>> #define PMC_CLK_OUT_MUX_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
>
> Maybe even:
>
> #define PMC_CLK_OUT_MUX_MASK(c) GENMASK(c->shift + 1, c->shift)
I want to point out that may be a separated gate/mux shifts is a fine
variant, you should try and see whether another variants produce more
concise result.
[snip]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists