[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191218220037.4g6pzdvrhroaj4qu@gilmour.lan>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 23:00:37 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
Cc: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] dt-bindings: thermal: add YAML schema for
sun8i-thermal driver bindings
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 08:21:16PM -0800, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> From: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
>
> sun8i-thermal driver supports thermal sensor in wide range of Allwinner
> SoCs. Add YAML schema for its bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
> ---
> .../thermal/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ths.yaml | 146 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 146 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ths.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ths.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ths.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8768c2450633
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ths.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ths.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Allwinner SUN8I Thermal Controller Device Tree Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ths
> + - allwinner,sun8i-h3-ths
> + - allwinner,sun8i-r40-ths
> + - allwinner,sun50i-a64-ths
> + - allwinner,sun50i-h5-ths
> + - allwinner,sun50i-h6-ths
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + resets:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + nvmem-cells:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description: Calibration data for thermal sensors
> +
> + nvmem-cell-names:
> + const: calibration
> +
> +allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: allwinner,sun50i-h6-ths
> +
> + then:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 1
When minItems and maxItems are equal, you can only set one, the other
will be filled automatically.
> +
> + clock-names:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 1
> + items:
> + - const: bus
And this can even be just
clock-names:
const: bus
> +
> + else:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 2
> +
> + clock-names:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 2
> + items:
> + - const: bus
> + - const: mod
I'm not sure why you need the minItems set to 1 here though?
it's always 2 for the !H6 case, right?
if so, then we should even do something like:
properties:
...
# This is needed because we will need to check both the H6 and !H6
# case, and it must validate. So we make sure we match against the
# union of both cases.
clocks:
minItems: 1
maxItems: 2
items:
- description: Bus Clock
- description: Module Clock
# Same story here
clock-names:
minItems: 1
maxItems: 2
items:
- const: bus
- const: mod
allOf:
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
const: allwinner,sun50i-h6-ths
# Here we validate in the H6 case we only have one clock
then:
properties:
clocks:
maxItems: 1
clock-names:
maxItems: 1
# and here that in the other case we have two clocks, the names
# being validated by the schema above
else:
properties:
clocks:
maxItems: 2
clock-names:
maxItems: 2
# And now we can set this since all our properties will have been
# expressed in the upper level schema
additionalProperties: false
> +
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: allwinner,sun8i-h3-ths
> +
> + then:
> + properties:
> + "#thermal-sensor-cells":
> + const: 0
> +
> + else:
> + properties:
> + "#thermal-sensor-cells":
> + const: 1
Same thing here, you should have an enum accepting both values in the
upper schema, the condition here only making further checks. Also, in
the case where #thermal-sensor-cells is one, then you need to document
what that argument is.
Thanks!
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists