lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76b080f8db89a75cc238c5e1e08c4e7104df3300.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:12:11 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christian Bundy <christianbundy@...ction.io>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm_tis: reserve chip for duration of
 tpm_tis_core_init

On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 13:29 -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> I just heard back from the t490s user, and as expected the problem still exists
> there with this patch.

OK. Now we have to reason what still is behaving incorrectly
and create a proper fix. Is he available to test a subsequent
fix?

Since the holidays are coming it might anyway take early Jan
before we can test anything but we can still try to find the
root cause by inspection.

/Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ