linux-kernel - [PATCH v10 09/12] soc: mediatek: Add extra sram control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1576657848-14711-10-git-send-email-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:30:45 +0800
From:   Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
To:     Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>
CC:     James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
        Fan Chen <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 09/12] soc: mediatek: Add extra sram control

For some power domains like vpu_core on MT8183 whose sram need to
do clock and internal isolation while power on/off sram.
We add a flag "sram_iso_ctrl" in scp_domain_data to judge if we
need to do the extra sram isolation control or not.

Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
index 9f06f17..e010fb3 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
 #define PWR_ON_BIT			BIT(2)
 #define PWR_ON_2ND_BIT			BIT(3)
 #define PWR_CLK_DIS_BIT			BIT(4)
+#define PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT		BIT(5)
+#define PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT		BIT(6)
 
 #define PWR_STATUS_CONN			BIT(1)
 #define PWR_STATUS_DISP			BIT(3)
@@ -86,6 +88,8 @@
  * @name: The domain name.
  * @sta_mask: The mask for power on/off status bit.
  * @ctl_offs: The offset for main power control register.
+ * @sram_iso_ctrl: The flag to judge if the power domain need to do
+ *                 the extra sram isolation control.
  * @sram_pdn_bits: The mask for sram power control bits.
  * @sram_pdn_ack_bits: The mask for sram power control acked bits.
  * @basic_clk_name: The basic clocks required by this power domain.
@@ -98,6 +102,7 @@ struct scp_domain_data {
 	const char *name;
 	u32 sta_mask;
 	int ctl_offs;
+	bool sram_iso_ctrl;
 	u32 sram_pdn_bits;
 	u32 sram_pdn_ack_bits;
 	const char *basic_clk_name[MAX_CLKS];
@@ -233,6 +238,14 @@ static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
+	if (scpd->data->sram_iso_ctrl)	{
+		val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
+		writel(val, ctl_addr);
+		udelay(1);
+		val &= ~PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
+		writel(val, ctl_addr);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -242,8 +255,15 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
 	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
 	int tmp;
 
-	val = readl(ctl_addr);
-	val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+	if (scpd->data->sram_iso_ctrl)	{
+		val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
+		writel(val, ctl_addr);
+		val &= ~PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
+		writel(val, ctl_addr);
+		udelay(1);
+	}
+
+	val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
 	writel(val, ctl_addr);
 
 	/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
-- 
1.8.1.1.dirty