lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:28:25 +0000
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC:     James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC/mc: Fix use-after-free and memleaks during device
 removal

On 18/12/2019 06:22, Robert Richter wrote:
> A test kernel with the options set below revealed several issues when
> removing a mci device:
> 
>   DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE
>   KASAN
>   DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
> 
> Issues seen:
> 
> 1) Use-after-free:
> 
> On 27.11.19 17:07:33, John Garry wrote:
>> [   22.104498] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in
>> edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device+0x148/0x180
> 
> The use-after-free is triggered in edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device(). It
> became an issue with commit c498afaf7df8 ("EDAC: Introduce an
> mci_for_each_dimm() iterator").
> 
> The reason for it is that device_unregister(&dimm->dev) not only
> removes the sysfs entry, it also frees the dimm struct in
> dimm_attr_release(). When incrementing the loop in
> mci_for_each_dimm(), the dimm struct is accessed again by the loop
> iterator which causes the use-after-free.
> 
> In function edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device() all the mci device's
> subsequent dimm and csrow objects are removed. When unregistering from
> sysfs, instead of removing that data it should be kept until it is
> removed together with the mci device. This keeps the data structures
> intact and the mci device can be fully used until it will be removed.
> 
> 2) Memory leaks:
> 
> Following memory leaks have been detected:
> 
>   # grep edac /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak | sort | uniq -c
>         1     [<000000003c0f58f9>] edac_mc_alloc+0x3bc/0x9d0      # mci->csrows
>        16     [<00000000bb932dc0>] edac_mc_alloc+0x49c/0x9d0      # csr->channels
>        16     [<00000000e2734dba>] edac_mc_alloc+0x518/0x9d0      # csr->channels[chn]
>         1     [<00000000eb040168>] edac_mc_alloc+0x5c8/0x9d0      # mci->dimms
>        34     [<00000000ef737c29>] ghes_edac_register+0x1c8/0x3f8 # see edac_mc_alloc()
> 
> There are two implementions for device removal in the driver. One is
> used before edac_mc_add_mc(), the other afterwards after the device
> had been registered in sysfs. The later lacks the removal of some data
> allocated in edac_mc_alloc(). All the above issues are fixed as
> follows:
> 
> Unify release code in a single mci_release() function and use this one
> together with put_device() to release the struct mci once there are no
> users. Free all subsequent data structures of the children devices in
> that release function too. An effect of this is that no data is freed
> in edac_mc_sysfs.c (except the "mc" sysfs root node). All sysfs
> entries have the mci device as a parent, so its refcount will keep the
> struct from being removed as long as sysfs entries exist. Before
> freeing struct mci, all sysfs entries are removed now in edac_remove_
> sysfs_mci_device(). With the changes made the mci_for_each_dimm() loop
> is now save to remove dimm devices from sysfs.
> 
> The patch has been tested with the above kernel options, no issues
> seen any longer.
> 
> This patch should be marked as stable.

Not sure why you haven't...

> 
> Reported-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>

The splats and leaks have disappeared for when booting my arm64 machine:
Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>

thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ