[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191218144555.GA12525@bogus>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:45:55 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Jolly Shah <jolly.shah@...inx.com>
Cc: ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, mingo@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, matt@...eblueprint.co.uk,
hkallweit1@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
rajanv@...inx.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] firmware: xilinx: Add xilinx specific sysfs interface
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 03:29:14PM -0800, Jolly Shah wrote:
> This patch series adds xilinx specific sysfs interface for below
> purposes:
> - Register access
> - Set shutdown scope
> - Set boot health status bit
This series defeats the whole abstraction EEMI provides. By providing
direct register accesses, you are allowing user-space to do whatever it
wants. I had NACKed this idea before. Has anything changed ?
If you need it for testing firmware, better put them in debugfs which is
off on production builds.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists