[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191218162606.GC482612@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:26:06 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Vipul Kumar <vipulk0511@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Srikanth Krishnakar <Srikanth_Krishnakar@...tor.com>,
Cedric Hombourger <Cedric_Hombourger@...tor.com>,
Vipul Kumar <vipul_kumar@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: Unset TSC_KNOWN_FREQ and TSC_RELIABLE flags on
Intel Bay Trail SoC
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 09:00:39PM +0530, Vipul Kumar wrote:
> From: Vipul Kumar <vipul_kumar@...tor.com>
>
> 'commit f3a02ecebed7 ("x86/tsc: Set TSC_KNOWN_FREQ and TSC_RELIABLE
> flags on Intel Atom SoCs")', causing time drift for Bay trail SoC.
> These flags are set for SoCs having cpuid_level 0x15 or more.
> Bay trail is having cpuid_level 0xb.
>
> So, unset both flags to make sure the clocksource calibration can
> be done.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vipul Kumar <vipul_kumar@...tor.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc_msr.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists