[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6192b57c-12ab-ec6c-ab95-d9b9bff3efad@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:41:53 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Yi L <yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Add nested translation helper
function
Hi again,
On 12/17/19 3:24 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> +/**
> + * intel_pasid_setup_nested() - Set up PASID entry for nested translation
> + * which is used for vSVA. The first level page tables are used for
> + * GVA-GPA or GIOVA-GPA translation in the guest, second level page tables
> + * are used for GPA-HPA translation.
> + *
> + * @iommu: Iommu which the device belong to
> + * @dev: Device to be set up for translation
> + * @gpgd: FLPTPTR: First Level Page translation pointer in GPA
> + * @pasid: PASID to be programmed in the device PASID table
> + * @pasid_data: Additional PASID info from the guest bind request
> + * @domain: Domain info for setting up second level page tables
> + * @addr_width: Address width of the first level (guest)
> + */
> +int intel_pasid_setup_nested(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> + struct device *dev, pgd_t *gpgd,
> + int pasid, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data_vtd *pasid_data,
> + struct dmar_domain *domain,
> + int addr_width)
> +{
> + struct pasid_entry *pte;
> + struct dma_pte *pgd;
> + u64 pgd_val;
> + int agaw;
> + u16 did;
> +
> + if (!ecap_nest(iommu->ecap)) {
> + pr_err("IOMMU: %s: No nested translation support\n",
> + iommu->name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + pte = intel_pasid_get_entry(dev, pasid);
> + if (WARN_ON(!pte))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + pasid_clear_entry(pte);
In some cases, e.g. nested mode for GIOVA-HPA, the PASID entry might
have already been setup for second level translation. (This could be
checked with the Present bit.) Hence, it's safe to flush caches here.
Or, maybe intel_pasid_tear_down_entry() is more suitable?
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists