linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 09/12] soc: mediatek: Add extra sram control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:57:50 +0800
From:   Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
To:     Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
        Fan Chen <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/12] soc: mediatek: Add extra sram control

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:31 PM Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> For some power domains like vpu_core on MT8183 whose sram need to
> do clock and internal isolation while power on/off sram.
> We add a flag "sram_iso_ctrl" in scp_domain_data to judge if we
> need to do the extra sram isolation control or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>

Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>

> ---
>  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> index 9f06f17..e010fb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
>  #define PWR_ON_BIT                     BIT(2)
>  #define PWR_ON_2ND_BIT                 BIT(3)
>  #define PWR_CLK_DIS_BIT                        BIT(4)
> +#define PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT            BIT(5)
> +#define PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT          BIT(6)
>
>  #define PWR_STATUS_CONN                        BIT(1)
>  #define PWR_STATUS_DISP                        BIT(3)
> @@ -86,6 +88,8 @@
>   * @name: The domain name.
>   * @sta_mask: The mask for power on/off status bit.
>   * @ctl_offs: The offset for main power control register.
> + * @sram_iso_ctrl: The flag to judge if the power domain need to do
> + *                 the extra sram isolation control.
>   * @sram_pdn_bits: The mask for sram power control bits.
>   * @sram_pdn_ack_bits: The mask for sram power control acked bits.
>   * @basic_clk_name: The basic clocks required by this power domain.
> @@ -98,6 +102,7 @@ struct scp_domain_data {
>         const char *name;
>         u32 sta_mask;
>         int ctl_offs;
> +       bool sram_iso_ctrl;
>         u32 sram_pdn_bits;
>         u32 sram_pdn_ack_bits;
>         const char *basic_clk_name[MAX_CLKS];
> @@ -233,6 +238,14 @@ static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
>                         return ret;
>         }
>
> +       if (scpd->data->sram_iso_ctrl)  {
> +               val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
> +               writel(val, ctl_addr);
> +               udelay(1);
> +               val &= ~PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
> +               writel(val, ctl_addr);
> +       }
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -242,8 +255,15 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
>         u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
>         int tmp;
>
> -       val = readl(ctl_addr);
> -       val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
> +       if (scpd->data->sram_iso_ctrl)  {
> +               val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
> +               writel(val, ctl_addr);
> +               val &= ~PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
> +               writel(val, ctl_addr);
> +               udelay(1);
> +       }
> +
> +       val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
>         writel(val, ctl_addr);
>
>         /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
> --
> 1.8.1.1.dirty