linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: qcom-qmp: Add MSM8996 UFS QMP support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:50:47 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: qcom-qmp: Add MSM8996 UFS QMP support

On 07-12-19, 12:21, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> The support for the 14nm MSM8996 UFS PHY is currently handled by the
> UFS-specific 14nm QMP driver, due to the earlier need for additional
> operations beyond the standard PHY API.
> 
> Add support for this PHY to the common QMP driver, to allow us to remove
> the old driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qmp-phy.txt  |   5 +
>  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c           | 106 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 111 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qmp-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qmp-phy.txt
> index eac9ad3cbbc8..5b99cf081817 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qmp-phy.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qmp-phy.txt
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Required properties:
>   - compatible: compatible list, contains:
>  	       "qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy" for PCIe phy on IPQ8074
>  	       "qcom,msm8996-qmp-pcie-phy" for 14nm PCIe phy on msm8996,
> +	       "qcom,msm8996-qmp-ufs-phy" for 14nm UFS phy on msm8996,
>  	       "qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy" for 14nm USB3 phy on msm8996,
>  	       "qcom,msm8998-qmp-usb3-phy" for USB3 QMP V3 phy on msm8998,
>  	       "qcom,msm8998-qmp-ufs-phy" for UFS QMP phy on msm8998,
> @@ -44,6 +45,8 @@ Required properties:
>  		For "qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy": no clocks are listed.
>  		For "qcom,msm8996-qmp-pcie-phy" must contain:
>  			"aux", "cfg_ahb", "ref".
> +		For "qcom,msm8996-qmp-ufs-phy" must contain:
> +			"ref".
>  		For "qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy" must contain:
>  			"aux", "cfg_ahb", "ref".
>  		For "qcom,msm8998-qmp-usb3-phy" must contain:
> @@ -72,6 +75,8 @@ Required properties:
>  			"phy", "common".
>  		For "qcom,msm8996-qmp-pcie-phy" must contain:
>  			"phy", "common", "cfg".
> +		For "qcom,msm8996-qmp-ufs-phy": must contain:
> +			"ufsphy".
>  		For "qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy" must contain
>  			"phy", "common".
>  		For "qcom,msm8998-qmp-usb3-phy" must contain
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> index a6b8fc5798e2..d81516c4d747 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> @@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ enum qphy_reg_layout {
>  	QPHY_PCS_LFPS_RXTERM_IRQ_STATUS,
>  };
>  
> +static const unsigned int msm8996_ufsphy_regs_layout[] = {
> +	[QPHY_START_CTRL]		= 0x00,
> +	[QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS]		= 0x168,
> +};
> +
>  static const unsigned int pciephy_regs_layout[] = {
>  	[QPHY_COM_SW_RESET]		= 0x400,
>  	[QPHY_COM_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL]	= 0x404,
> @@ -330,6 +335,75 @@ static const struct qmp_phy_init_tbl msm8998_pcie_pcs_tbl[] = {
>  	QMP_PHY_INIT_CFG(QPHY_V3_PCS_SIGDET_CNTRL, 0x03),
>  };
>  
> +static const struct qmp_phy_init_tbl msm8996_ufs_serdes_tbl[] = {
> +	QMP_PHY_INIT_CFG(QPHY_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL, 0x01),

Can you check this after adding the reset for ufs, I suspect you might
run into same issue as I am seeing on 8150, power down here does not
seem correct.

-- 
~Vinod