[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191219204733.791f7380.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:47:33 +0100
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 26/45] KVM: s390: Invoke kvm_vcpu_init() before
allocating sie_page
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:55:11 -0800
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> wrote:
> Now that s390's implementation of kvm_arch_vcpu_init() is empty, move
> the call to kvm_vcpu_init() above the allocation of the sie_page. This
> paves the way for moving vcpu allocation and initialization into common
> KVM code without any associated functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Seems to be fine.
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists