[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a708948-7140-d8f3-a5ec-d242ae0737d4@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:16:17 +0000
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"juri.lelli@...hat.com" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"dietmar.eggemann@....com" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
"bsegall@...gle.com" <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Micro optimization in pick_next_task() and in
check_preempt_curr()
On 19.12.2019 19:22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 19:08:05 +0300
> Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
>
>> Should I resend this as two patches, with your changes in a separate?
>
> You don't have to, you can include multiple SOBs if a patch was written
> by two people.
>
> But perhaps it will better to do so, that way people will know who to
> blame when the linker breaks ;-)
>
> I'll send you a patch that you can apply just before your change. That
> may be the cleanest way.
Two small patches look better then one huge, so I prefer to send a patch
on top of yours :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists