[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a77oy3oe.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:07:13 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
David Laight <david.laight@...lab.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
dev@...ncontainers.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
libc-alpha@...rceware.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] uapi: split openat2(2) definitions from fcntl.h
* Aleksa Sarai:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/openat2.h b/include/uapi/linux/openat2.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..19ef775e8e5e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/openat2.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_OPENAT2_H
> +#define _UAPI_LINUX_OPENAT2_H
I think you should include the relevant header for __align_u64
etc. here.
[…]
> + * Arguments for how openat2(2) should open the target path. If @resolve is
> + * zero, then openat2(2) operates very similarly to openat(2).
> + *
> + * However, unlike openat(2), unknown bits in @flags result in -EINVAL rather
> + * than being silently ignored. @mode must be zero unless one of {O_CREAT,
> + * O_TMPFILE} are set.
> + *
> + * @flags: O_* flags.
> + * @mode: O_CREAT/O_TMPFILE file mode.
> + * @resolve: RESOLVE_* flags.
> + */
> +struct open_how {
> + __aligned_u64 flags;
> + __u16 mode;
> + __u16 __padding[3]; /* must be zeroed */
> + __aligned_u64 resolve;
> +};
> +
> +#define OPEN_HOW_SIZE_VER0 24 /* sizeof first published struct */
> +#define OPEN_HOW_SIZE_LATEST OPEN_HOW_SIZE_VER0
Are these really useful for the UAPI header? Is there a situation where
OPEN_HOW_SIZE_LATEST would be different from sizeof (struct open_how)?
The header is not compatible with the assembler anyway, so the numeric
constant does not seem useful.
Thanks,
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists