[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1-hsnidMzQJghRGE-1voP4WHDoOLRZHe9P-UmTpea+Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:31:41 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, gpascutto@...illa.com,
ealvarez@...illa.com, jld@...illa.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] pid: Add PIDFD_IOCTL_GETFD to fetch file
descriptors from processes
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:35 AM Christian Brauner
<christian.brauner@...ntu.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:03:09AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 12:55 AM Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me> wrote:
> What does everyone else think? Arnd, still in favor of a syscall I take it.
Yes, but I would not object the ioctl if others prefer that.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists