[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0oNYMoyLbpPqNaXSWV3j7dXhKZ5GLq1EEGA=ansVxvsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:06:36 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/27] compat_ioctl: scsi: move ioctl handling into drivers
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:57 PM Ben Hutchings
<ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 23:16 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * CDROM ioctls are handled in the block layer, but
> > + * do the scsi blk ioctls here.
> > + */
> > + ret = scsi_cmd_blk_ioctl(bdev, mode, cmd, argp);
> > + if (ret != -ENOTTY)
> > + return ret;
>
> This needs to be be "goto put;"
Fixed now, thanks!
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists