lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:05:04 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Aleksa Sarai' <cyphar@...har.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
CC:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        "dev@...ncontainers.org" <dev@...ncontainers.org>,
        "containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "libc-alpha@...rceware.org" <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
        "linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] uapi: split openat2(2) definitions from fcntl.h

From: Aleksa Sarai
> Sent: 19 December 2019 13:45
> On 2019-12-19, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com> wrote:
> > * Aleksa Sarai:
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/openat2.h b/include/uapi/linux/openat2.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..19ef775e8e5e
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/openat2.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> > > +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_OPENAT2_H
> > > +#define _UAPI_LINUX_OPENAT2_H
> >
> > I think you should include the relevant header for __align_u64
> > etc. here.
> 
> Right -- no idea why I forgot to include them.

I'm guessing that is just 64bit aligned on 32bit archs like x86?

No need to enforce it provided the structure will have no padding
on archs where the 64bit fields are 64bit aligned.
A plain __u64 should be fine.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ