linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: Add DT bindings for Kryo EDAC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86b3a0735df320bc7808930f2bbd0d97@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:18:47 +0530
From:   Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
        linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Trilok Soni <tsoni@...eaurora.org>,
        Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: Add DT bindings for Kryo EDAC

On 2019-12-19 19:28, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > Is that your intent?
>> >
>> 
>> No, I want any combination of interrupts to be valid with atleast one
>> interrupt as mandatory.
>> I thought specifying minItems as 1 and maxItems as 4 will take care of
>> this,  am I doing something wrong?
> 
> Interrupts (really all properties) have a defined order in DT and an
> 'items' list defines both the order and index. You'll need to use
> oneOf and list out the possibilities. Stick to ones you actually need.
> 

Thanks, I will make the change in the next spin.

-Sai

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation