linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 022/162] pinctrl: qcom: ssbi-gpio: fix gpio-hog related boot issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191219183208.625746119@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 19 Dec 2019 19:32:10 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 022/162] pinctrl: qcom: ssbi-gpio: fix gpio-hog related boot issues

From: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>

[ Upstream commit 7ed07855773814337b9814f1c3e866df52ebce68 ]

When attempting to setup up a gpio hog, device probing will repeatedly
fail with -EPROBE_DEFERED errors. It is caused by a circular dependency
between the gpio and pinctrl frameworks. If the gpio-ranges property is
present in device tree, then the gpio framework will handle the gpio pin
registration and eliminate the circular dependency.

See Christian Lamparter's commit a86caa9ba5d7 ("pinctrl: msm: fix
gpio-hog related boot issues") for a detailed commit message that
explains the issue in much more detail. The code comment in this commit
came from Christian's commit.

I did not test this change against any hardware supported by this
particular driver, however I was able to validate this same fix works
for pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c using a LG Nexus 5 (hammerhead) phone.

Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c
index b1e8a2d905ff1..a0904e426c734 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c
@@ -755,12 +755,23 @@ static int pm8xxx_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto unregister_pinctrl;
 	}
 
-	ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&pctrl->chip,
-				     dev_name(pctrl->dev),
-				     0, 0, pctrl->chip.ngpio);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(pctrl->dev, "failed to add pin range\n");
-		goto unregister_gpiochip;
+	/*
+	 * For DeviceTree-supported systems, the gpio core checks the
+	 * pinctrl's device node for the "gpio-ranges" property.
+	 * If it is present, it takes care of adding the pin ranges
+	 * for the driver. In this case the driver can skip ahead.
+	 *
+	 * In order to remain compatible with older, existing DeviceTree
+	 * files which don't set the "gpio-ranges" property or systems that
+	 * utilize ACPI the driver has to call gpiochip_add_pin_range().
+	 */
+	if (!of_property_read_bool(pctrl->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
+		ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&pctrl->chip, dev_name(pctrl->dev),
+					     0, 0, pctrl->chip.ngpio);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(pctrl->dev, "failed to add pin range\n");
+			goto unregister_gpiochip;
+		}
 	}
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctrl);
-- 
2.20.1