linux-kernel - Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Fix nits in the kunit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191220051831.25296-1-sj38.park@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Dec 2019 06:18:31 +0100
From:   SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
To:     SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Cc:     shuah <shuah@...nel.org>, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
        sjpark@...zon.com, corbet@....net, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, sjpark@...zon.de
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Fix nits in the kunit

On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 06:01:21 +0100 SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:37:28 -0700 shuah <shuah@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 12/11/19 7:27 PM, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > This patchset contains trivial fixes for the kunit documentations and
> > > the wrapper python scripts.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Baseline
> > > --------
> > > 
> > > This patchset is based on 'kselftest/fixes' branch of
> > > linux-kselftest[1].  A complete tree is available at my repo:
> > > https://github.com/sjp38/linux/tree/kunit_fix/20191205_v6
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Version History
> > > ---------------
> > > 
> > > Changes from v5
> > > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20191205093440.21824-1-sjpark@amazon.com):
> > >   - Rebased on kselftest/fixes
> > >   - Add 'Reviewed-by' and 'Tested-by' from Brendan Higgins
> > > 
> > > Changes from v4
> > > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/1575490683-13015-1-git-send-email-sj38.park@gmail.com/):
> > >   - Rebased on Heidi Fahim's patch[2]
> > >   - Fix failing kunit_tool_test test
> > >   - Add 'build_dir' option test in 'kunit_tool_test.py'
> > > 
> > > Changes from v3
> > > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20191204192141.GA247851@google.com):
> > >   - Fix the 4th patch, "kunit: Place 'test.log' under the 'build_dir'" to
> > >     set default value of 'build_dir' as '' instead of NULL so that kunit
> > >     can run even though '--build_dir' option is not given.
> > > 
> > > Changes from v2
> > > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/1575361141-6806-1-git-send-email-sj38.park@gmail.com):
> > >   - Make 'build_dir' if not exists (missed from v3 by mistake)
> > > 
> > > Changes from v1
> > > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/1575242724-4937-1-git-send-email-sj38.park@gmail.com):
> > >   - Remove "docs/kunit/start: Skip wrapper run command" (A similar
> > >     approach is ongoing)
> > >   - Make 'build_dir' if not exists
> > > 
> > > SeongJae Park (6):
> > >    docs/kunit/start: Use in-tree 'kunit_defconfig'
> > >    kunit: Remove duplicated defconfig creation
> > >    kunit: Create default config in '--build_dir'
> > >    kunit: Place 'test.log' under the 'build_dir'
> > >    kunit: Rename 'kunitconfig' to '.kunitconfig'
> > >    kunit/kunit_tool_test: Test '--build_dir' option run
> > > 
> > >   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 13 +++++--------
> > >   tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py            | 18 +++++++++++-------
> > >   tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py     | 10 +++++-----
> > >   tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py  | 10 +++++++++-
> > >   4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi SeongJae Park,
> > 
> > Please make sure your From and Signed-off-by addresses match. I tried
> > applying these patches and I am seeing warnings.
> > 
> > WARNING: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'SeongJae 
> > Park <sj38.park@...il.com>'
> 
> I tried to reproduce the warning on my side using 'git am' and 'checkpatch.pl',
> but those doesn't show me such warnings.  Could you please let me know what
> command you use?  Or, you could simply ignore the warning and use 'SeongJae
> Park <sjpark@...zon.de>'.

Seems like 'send-email' has ignored 'From:' in my original patche files.  I
rebased those on latest kselftest/fixes and sent v7.  If anything wrong, please
let me know.


Thanks,
SeongJae Park

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> SeongJae Park
> 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > -- Shuah
>