[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e69d0b803cdbfe69d6edb62b8aa9b24@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:44:25 +0800
From: cang@...eaurora.org
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] phy: qcom-qmp: Use register defines
On 2019-12-19 23:04, Vinod Koul wrote:
> We already define register offsets so use them in register layout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> index c2e800a3825a..06f971ca518e 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> @@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ static const unsigned int
> sdm845_ufsphy_regs_layout[] = {
> };
>
> static const unsigned int sm8150_ufsphy_regs_layout[] = {
> - [QPHY_START_CTRL] = 0x00,
> - [QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS] = 0x180,
> + [QPHY_START_CTRL] = QPHY_V4_PHY_START,
> + [QPHY_SW_RESET] = QPHY_V4_SW_RESET,
> };
>
> static const struct qmp_phy_init_tbl msm8996_pcie_serdes_tbl[] = {
Why is the QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS removed here? Then what "status" are we
polling here for UFS PHY?
<snip>
if (cfg->type == PHY_TYPE_UFS) {
status = pcs + cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS];
mask = PCS_READY;
ready = PCS_READY;
} else {
<snip>
Can Guo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists