[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191220083216.GK2536@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:02:16 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, nm@...com, ssantosh@...nel.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@...com,
lokeshvutla@...com, t-kristo@...com, tony@...mide.com,
j-keerthy@...com, vigneshr@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/12] dmaengine: Add metadata_ops for
dma_async_tx_descriptor
Hi Peter,
On 09-12-19, 11:43, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> +int dmaengine_desc_attach_metadata(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc,
> + void *data, size_t len)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!desc)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = desc_check_and_set_metadata_mode(desc, DESC_METADATA_CLIENT);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!desc->metadata_ops || !desc->metadata_ops->attach)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + return desc->metadata_ops->attach(desc, data, len);
this looks good to me, only thing is we should check if people are
mixing the modes :)
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists