linux-kernel - [PATCH ] drm/radeon: Fix potential buffer overflow in ci_set_mc_special

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1576806905-4590-1-git-send-email-chenmaodong@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:55:05 +0800
From:   chenmaodong <chenmaodong@...wei.com>
To:     <alexander.deucher@....com>, <christian.koenig@....com>,
        <David1.Zhou@....com>, <airlied@...ux.ie>, <daniel@...ll.ch>
CC:     <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <zhangpan26@...wei.com>,
        <wuxu.wu@...wei.com>, <hushiyuan@...wei.com>,
        <chenmaodong@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH ] drm/radeon: Fix potential buffer overflow in ci_set_mc_special_registers()

Hi,

The length of table->mc_reg_address is SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE.

In ci_set_mc_special_registers(), the boundary checking

here("if (j > SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE)") allows 'j' equal to

SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE which can easily cause the 

table->mc_reg_address to read out of bounds. 

To solve this problem, we change ">" to ">=" and check this boundary 

of table->mc_reg_address after "pi->mem_gddr5" is false.

Signed-off-by: chenmaodong <chenmaodong@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ci_dpm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ci_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ci_dpm.c
index a97294a..42ef745a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ci_dpm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ci_dpm.c
@@ -4364,10 +4364,10 @@ static int ci_set_mc_special_registers(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 					table->mc_reg_table_entry[k].mc_data[j] |= 0x100;
 			}
 			j++;
-			if (j > SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE)
-				return -EINVAL;
 
 			if (!pi->mem_gddr5) {
+				if (j >= SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE)
+					return -EINVAL;
 				table->mc_reg_address[j].s1 = MC_PMG_AUTO_CMD >> 2;
 				table->mc_reg_address[j].s0 = MC_PMG_AUTO_CMD >> 2;
 				for (k = 0; k < table->num_entries; k++) {
-- 
2.7.4