lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11cdb8cb-579c-0655-0f42-625680b8249f@acm.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Dec 2019 07:23:30 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/lockdep: Fix buffer overrun problem in
 stack_trace[]

On 2019-12-20 05:51, Waiman Long wrote:
> If the lockdep code is really running out of the stack_trace entries,
> it is likely that buffer overrun can happen and the data immediately
> after stack_trace[] will be corrupted.
> 
> If there is less than LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS entries left before
> the call to save_trace(), the max_entries computation will leave it
> with a very large positive number because of its unsigned nature. The
> subsequent call to stack_trace_save() will then corrupt the data after
> stack_trace[]. Fix that by changing max_entries to a signed integer
> and check for negative value before calling stack_trace_save().

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ