linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 05/15] remoteproc/omap: Add the rproc ops .da_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANLsYkz=ZV-AABXq2mSdwKkcdkQgFwStepteFnMBc4j=ahe4Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:12:28 -0700
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 05/15] remoteproc/omap: Add the rproc ops .da_to_va() implementation

On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 06:18, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com> wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2019 02:38, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 02:55:27PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
> >> From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
> >>
> >> An implementation for the rproc ops .da_to_va() has been added
> >> that provides the address translation between device addresses
> >> to kernel virtual addresses for internal RAMs present on that
> >> particular remote processor device. The implementation provides
> >> the translations based on the addresses parsed and stored during
> >> the probe.
> >>
> >> This ops gets invoked by the exported rproc_da_to_va() function
> >> and allows the remoteproc core's ELF loader to be able to load
> >> program data directly into the internal memories.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
> >> index 844703507a74..28f14e24b389 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
> >> @@ -232,10 +232,49 @@ static int omap_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> >>      return 0;
> >>   }
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> + * omap_rproc_da_to_va() - internal memory translation helper
> >> + * @rproc: remote processor to apply the address translation for
> >> + * @da: device address to translate
> >> + * @len: length of the memory buffer
> >> + *
> >> + * Custom function implementing the rproc .da_to_va ops to provide address
> >> + * translation (device address to kernel virtual address) for internal RAMs
> >> + * present in a DSP or IPU device). The translated addresses can be used
> >> + * either by the remoteproc core for loading, or by any rpmsg bus drivers.
> >> + * Returns the translated virtual address in kernel memory space, or NULL
> >> + * in failure.
> >> + */
> >> +static void *omap_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
> >> +{
> >> +    struct omap_rproc *oproc = rproc->priv;
> >> +    int i;
> >> +    u32 offset;
> >> +
> >> +    if (len <= 0)
> >> +            return NULL;
> >> +
> >> +    if (!oproc->num_mems)
> >> +            return NULL;
> >> +
> >> +    for (i = 0; i < oproc->num_mems; i++) {
> >> +            if (da >= oproc->mem[i].dev_addr && da + len <=
> >
> > Shouldn't this be '<' rather than '<=' ?
>
> No, I think <= is correct. You need to consider the initial byte in the
> range also. Consider a simple case where you provide the exact da + len
> corresponding to a specific memory range.

For that specific case you are correct.  On the flip side if @da falls
somewhere after @mem[i].dev_addr, there is a possibility to clobber
the first byte of the next range if <= is used.

Thanks,
Mathieu

>
> >
> >> +                oproc->mem[i].dev_addr +  oproc->mem[i].size) {
> >
> > One space too many after the '+' .
>
> True, I wonder why checkpatch did not catch this.
>
> >
> >> +                    offset = da -  oproc->mem[i].dev_addr;
> >
> > One space too many after then '-' .
>
> Same, will fix these two.
>
> -Tero
>
> >
> >> +                    /* __force to make sparse happy with type conversion */
> >> +                    return (__force void *)(oproc->mem[i].cpu_addr +
> >> +                                            offset);
> >> +            }
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    return NULL;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>   static const struct rproc_ops omap_rproc_ops = {
> >>      .start          = omap_rproc_start,
> >>      .stop           = omap_rproc_stop,
> >>      .kick           = omap_rproc_kick,
> >> +    .da_to_va       = omap_rproc_da_to_va,
> >>   };
> >>
> >>   static const char * const ipu_mem_names[] = {
> >> --
> >> 2.17.1
> >>
> >> --
>
> --
> Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki