[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95473676-5bb9-0104-38ac-0d196d3ded83@web.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:30:28 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: string.h: Mark 34 functions with __must_check
> Several functions return values with which useful data processing
> should be performed. These values must not be ignored then.
> Thus use the annotation “__must_check” in the shown function declarations.
Will such a software development topic be clarified any further?
Would you like to continue the discussion?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists