[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGTfZH0LKmBzAokgN+2K4-PS87gc2GnchYaHJi33nMQBCTNS-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 05:15:06 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@...nel.org>
To: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...sung.com>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>, inki.dae@...sung.com,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 7/7] drm: exynos: mixer: Add interconnect support
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 9:03 PM Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>
> This patch adds interconnect support to exynos-mixer. The mixer works
> the same as before when CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is 'n'.
The patch description doesn't include why interconnect is required
and what to do.
>
> Co-developed-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c
> index 6cfdb95fef2f..a7e7240a055f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/component.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/interconnect.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -97,6 +98,7 @@ struct mixer_context {
> struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc;
> struct exynos_drm_plane planes[MIXER_WIN_NR];
> unsigned long flags;
> + struct icc_path *soc_path;
>
> int irq;
> void __iomem *mixer_regs;
> @@ -931,6 +933,40 @@ static void mixer_disable_vblank(struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc)
> mixer_reg_writemask(mixer_ctx, MXR_INT_EN, 0, MXR_INT_EN_VSYNC);
> }
>
> +static void mixer_set_memory_bandwidth(struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode = &crtc->base.state->adjusted_mode;
> + struct mixer_context *ctx = crtc->ctx;
> + unsigned long bw, bandwidth = 0;
> + int i, j, sub;
> +
> + if (!ctx->soc_path)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MIXER_WIN_NR; i++) {
> + struct drm_plane *plane = &ctx->planes[i].base;
> + const struct drm_format_info *format;
> +
> + if (plane->state && plane->state->crtc && plane->state->fb) {
> + format = plane->state->fb->format;
> + bw = mode->hdisplay * mode->vdisplay *
> + drm_mode_vrefresh(mode);
> + if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
> + bw /= 2;
> + for (j = 0; j < format->num_planes; j++) {
> + sub = j ? (format->vsub * format->hsub) : 1;
> + bandwidth += format->cpp[j] * bw / sub;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* add 20% safety margin */
> + bandwidth = bandwidth / 4 * 5;
> +
> + dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "exynos-mixer: safe bandwidth %ld Bps\n", bandwidth);
> + icc_set_bw(ctx->soc_path, Bps_to_icc(bandwidth), 0);
> +}
I recommend that add the role of this function in order to guarantee
the minimum bandwidth to prevent performance drop or h/w issue.
> +
> static void mixer_atomic_begin(struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct mixer_context *ctx = crtc->ctx;
> @@ -982,6 +1018,7 @@ static void mixer_atomic_flush(struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc)
> if (!test_bit(MXR_BIT_POWERED, &mixer_ctx->flags))
> return;
>
> + mixer_set_memory_bandwidth(crtc);
> mixer_enable_sync(mixer_ctx);
> exynos_crtc_handle_event(crtc);
> }
> @@ -1029,6 +1066,7 @@ static void mixer_disable(struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc)
> for (i = 0; i < MIXER_WIN_NR; i++)
> mixer_disable_plane(crtc, &ctx->planes[i]);
>
> + mixer_set_memory_bandwidth(crtc);
> exynos_drm_pipe_clk_enable(crtc, false);
>
> pm_runtime_put(ctx->dev);
> @@ -1220,12 +1258,22 @@ static int mixer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> const struct mixer_drv_data *drv;
> struct mixer_context *ctx;
> + struct icc_path *path;
> int ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Returns NULL if CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is disabled.
> + * May return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER).
> + */
> + path = of_icc_get(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(path))
> + return PTR_ERR(path);
> +
> ctx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!ctx) {
> DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to alloc mixer context.\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
> }
>
> drv = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> @@ -1233,6 +1281,7 @@ static int mixer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ctx->pdev = pdev;
> ctx->dev = dev;
> ctx->mxr_ver = drv->version;
> + ctx->soc_path = path;
>
> if (drv->is_vp_enabled)
> __set_bit(MXR_BIT_VP_ENABLED, &ctx->flags);
> @@ -1242,17 +1291,29 @@ static int mixer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctx);
>
> ret = component_add(&pdev->dev, &mixer_component_ops);
> - if (!ret)
> - pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err;
> +
> + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + icc_put(path);
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> static int mixer_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct mixer_context *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> +
> + component_del(dev, &mixer_component_ops);
>
> - component_del(&pdev->dev, &mixer_component_ops);
> + icc_put(ctx->soc_path);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Basically, I agree this patch about using ICC feature
to guarantee the minimum bandwidth. But, I don't have
the knowledge of exynos-mixer.c. So, just I reviewed
the part of ICC usage. After digging the exynos-mixer.c,
I'll reply the reviewed tag. Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists