linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu/vt-d: clean up 32bit si

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:46:37 -0500
From:   Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To:     Tom Murphy <murphyt7@....ie>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu/vt-d: clean up 32bit si_domain assignment

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 03:03:53PM +0000, Tom Murphy wrote:
> In the intel iommu driver devices which only support 32bit DMA can't be
> direct mapped. The implementation of this is weird. Currently we assign
> it a direct mapped domain and then remove the domain later and replace
> it with a domain of type IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY. We should just assign it
> a domain of type IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY from the begging rather than
> needlessly swapping domains.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Murphy <murphyt7@....ie>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 88 +++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index 0c8d81f56a30..c1ea66467918 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -5640,7 +5609,12 @@ static int intel_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>  	domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
>  	dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
>  	if (domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA) {
> -		if (device_def_domain_type(dev) == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY) {
> +		/*
> +		 * We check dma_mask >= dma_get_required_mask(dev) because
> +		 * 32 bit DMA falls back to non-identity mapping.
> +		 */
> +		if (device_def_domain_type(dev) == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY &&
> +				dma_mask >= dma_get_required_mask(dev)) {
>  			ret = iommu_request_dm_for_dev(dev);
>  			if (ret) {
>  				dmar_remove_one_dev_info(dev);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Should this be dma_direct_get_required_mask? dma_get_required_mask may
return DMA_BIT_MASK(32) -- it callbacks into intel_get_required_mask,
but I'm not sure what iommu_no_mapping(dev) will do at this point?