lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191221070006.267667-1-lkundrak@v3.sk>
Date:   Sat, 21 Dec 2019 08:00:06 +0100
From:   Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>,
        Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] component: do not dereference opaque pointer in debugfs

The match data does not have to be a struct device pointer, and indeed
very often is not. Attempt to treat it as such easily results in a
crash.

For the components that are not registered, we don't know which device
is missing. Once it it is there, we can use the struct component to get
the device and whether it's bound or not.

Fixes: 59e73854b5fd ('component: add debugfs support')
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
---
 drivers/base/component.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/component.c b/drivers/base/component.c
index 532a3a5d8f633..1fdbd6ff20580 100644
--- a/drivers/base/component.c
+++ b/drivers/base/component.c
@@ -102,11 +102,11 @@ static int component_devices_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
 	seq_printf(s, "%-40s %20s\n", "device name", "status");
 	seq_puts(s, "-------------------------------------------------------------\n");
 	for (i = 0; i < match->num; i++) {
-		struct device *d = (struct device *)match->compare[i].data;
+		struct component *component = match->compare[i].component;
 
-		seq_printf(s, "%-40s %20s\n", dev_name(d),
-			   match->compare[i].component ?
-			   "registered" : "not registered");
+		seq_printf(s, "%-40s %20s\n",
+			   component ? dev_name(component->dev) : "(unknown)",
+			   component ? (component->bound ? "bound" : "not bound") : "not registered");
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&component_mutex);
 
-- 
2.24.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ