[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191222164545.GA157733@zzz.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 10:45:45 -0600
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] fscrypt: Allow modular crypto algorithms
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 04:41:55PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 05:44:28PM -0600, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure this is a good idea, since there will probably need to be more
> > places where built-in code calls into fs/crypto/ too.
>
> Clearly it's going to be too much trouble for now. I may revisit
> this once the fscrypt code has settled down a little.
>
> However, we can at least build the algorithms as modules, like this:
>
> ---8<---
> The commit 643fa9612bf1 ("fscrypt: remove filesystem specific
> build config option") removed modular support for fs/crypto. This
> causes the Crypto API to be built-in whenever fscrypt is enabled.
> This makes it very difficult for me to test modular builds of
> the Crypto API without disabling fscrypt which is a pain.
>
> As fscrypt is still evolving and it's developing new ties with the
> fs layer, it's hard to build it as a module for now.
>
> However, the actual algorithms are not required until a filesystem
> is mounted. Therefore we can allow them to be built as modules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>
> diff --git a/fs/crypto/Kconfig b/fs/crypto/Kconfig
> index ff5a1746cbae..ae929fbc0f29 100644
> --- a/fs/crypto/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/crypto/Kconfig
> @@ -1,7 +1,19 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> config FS_ENCRYPTION
> bool "FS Encryption (Per-file encryption)"
> + select KEYS
> select CRYPTO
> + select CRYPTO_SKCIPHER
> + select CRYPTO_HASH
> + help
> + Enable encryption of files and directories. This
> + feature is similar to ecryptfs, but it is more memory
> + efficient since it avoids caching the encrypted and
> + decrypted pages in the page cache. Currently Ext4,
> + F2FS and UBIFS make use of this feature.
> +
> +config FS_ENCRYPTION_TRI
> + tristate
> select CRYPTO_AES
> select CRYPTO_CBC
> select CRYPTO_ECB
> @@ -9,10 +21,3 @@ config FS_ENCRYPTION
> select CRYPTO_CTS
> select CRYPTO_SHA512
> select CRYPTO_HMAC
> - select KEYS
> - help
> - Enable encryption of files and directories. This
> - feature is similar to ecryptfs, but it is more memory
> - efficient since it avoids caching the encrypted and
> - decrypted pages in the page cache. Currently Ext4,
> - F2FS and UBIFS make use of this feature.
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/Kconfig b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> index ef42ab040905..5de0bcc50d37 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config EXT3_FS
> select CRC16
> select CRYPTO
> select CRYPTO_CRC32C
> + select FS_ENCRYPTION_TRI if FS_ENCRYPTION
> help
> This config option is here only for backward compatibility. ext3
> filesystem is now handled by the ext4 driver.
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/Kconfig b/fs/f2fs/Kconfig
> index 652fd2e2b23d..9ccaec60af47 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/Kconfig
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ config F2FS_FS
> select CRYPTO
> select CRYPTO_CRC32
> select F2FS_FS_XATTR if FS_ENCRYPTION
> + select FS_ENCRYPTION_TRI if FS_ENCRYPTION
> help
> F2FS is based on Log-structured File System (LFS), which supports
> versatile "flash-friendly" features. The design has been focused on
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> index 69932bcfa920..ea2d43829c18 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config UBIFS_FS
> select CRYPTO_ZSTD if UBIFS_FS_ZSTD
> select CRYPTO_HASH_INFO
> select UBIFS_FS_XATTR if FS_ENCRYPTION
> + select FS_ENCRYPTION_TRI if FS_ENCRYPTION
> depends on MTD_UBI
> help
> UBIFS is a file system for flash devices which works on top of UBI.
Okay, this approach looks fine. But can you rename the option to something more
self-explanatory like FS_ENCRYPTION_ALGS, and add a comment? Like:
# Filesystems supporting encryption must select this if FS_ENCRYPTION. This
# allows the algorithms to be built as modules when all the filesystems are.
config FS_ENCRYPTION_ALGS
tristate
select CRYPTO_AES
select CRYPTO_CBC
select CRYPTO_ECB
select CRYPTO_XTS
select CRYPTO_CTS
select CRYPTO_SHA512
select CRYPTO_HMAC
Powered by blists - more mailing lists