lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191222164545.GA157733@zzz.localdomain>
Date:   Sun, 22 Dec 2019 10:45:45 -0600
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] fscrypt: Allow modular crypto algorithms

On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 04:41:55PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 05:44:28PM -0600, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure this is a good idea, since there will probably need to be more
> > places where built-in code calls into fs/crypto/ too.
> 
> Clearly it's going to be too much trouble for now.  I may revisit
> this once the fscrypt code has settled down a little.
> 
> However, we can at least build the algorithms as modules, like this:
> 
> ---8<---
> The commit 643fa9612bf1 ("fscrypt: remove filesystem specific
> build config option") removed modular support for fs/crypto.  This
> causes the Crypto API to be built-in whenever fscrypt is enabled.
> This makes it very difficult for me to test modular builds of
> the Crypto API without disabling fscrypt which is a pain.
> 
> As fscrypt is still evolving and it's developing new ties with the
> fs layer, it's hard to build it as a module for now.
> 
> However, the actual algorithms are not required until a filesystem
> is mounted.  Therefore we can allow them to be built as modules.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/crypto/Kconfig b/fs/crypto/Kconfig
> index ff5a1746cbae..ae929fbc0f29 100644
> --- a/fs/crypto/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/crypto/Kconfig
> @@ -1,7 +1,19 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>  config FS_ENCRYPTION
>  	bool "FS Encryption (Per-file encryption)"
> +	select KEYS
>  	select CRYPTO
> +	select CRYPTO_SKCIPHER
> +	select CRYPTO_HASH
> +	help
> +	  Enable encryption of files and directories.  This
> +	  feature is similar to ecryptfs, but it is more memory
> +	  efficient since it avoids caching the encrypted and
> +	  decrypted pages in the page cache.  Currently Ext4,
> +	  F2FS and UBIFS make use of this feature.
> +
> +config FS_ENCRYPTION_TRI
> +	tristate
>  	select CRYPTO_AES
>  	select CRYPTO_CBC
>  	select CRYPTO_ECB
> @@ -9,10 +21,3 @@ config FS_ENCRYPTION
>  	select CRYPTO_CTS
>  	select CRYPTO_SHA512
>  	select CRYPTO_HMAC
> -	select KEYS
> -	help
> -	  Enable encryption of files and directories.  This
> -	  feature is similar to ecryptfs, but it is more memory
> -	  efficient since it avoids caching the encrypted and
> -	  decrypted pages in the page cache.  Currently Ext4,
> -	  F2FS and UBIFS make use of this feature.
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/Kconfig b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> index ef42ab040905..5de0bcc50d37 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config EXT3_FS
>  	select CRC16
>  	select CRYPTO
>  	select CRYPTO_CRC32C
> +	select FS_ENCRYPTION_TRI if FS_ENCRYPTION
>  	help
>  	  This config option is here only for backward compatibility. ext3
>  	  filesystem is now handled by the ext4 driver.
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/Kconfig b/fs/f2fs/Kconfig
> index 652fd2e2b23d..9ccaec60af47 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/Kconfig
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ config F2FS_FS
>  	select CRYPTO
>  	select CRYPTO_CRC32
>  	select F2FS_FS_XATTR if FS_ENCRYPTION
> +	select FS_ENCRYPTION_TRI if FS_ENCRYPTION
>  	help
>  	  F2FS is based on Log-structured File System (LFS), which supports
>  	  versatile "flash-friendly" features. The design has been focused on
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> index 69932bcfa920..ea2d43829c18 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config UBIFS_FS
>  	select CRYPTO_ZSTD if UBIFS_FS_ZSTD
>  	select CRYPTO_HASH_INFO
>  	select UBIFS_FS_XATTR if FS_ENCRYPTION
> +	select FS_ENCRYPTION_TRI if FS_ENCRYPTION
>  	depends on MTD_UBI
>  	help
>  	  UBIFS is a file system for flash devices which works on top of UBI.

Okay, this approach looks fine.  But can you rename the option to something more
self-explanatory like FS_ENCRYPTION_ALGS, and add a comment?  Like:

# Filesystems supporting encryption must select this if FS_ENCRYPTION.  This
# allows the algorithms to be built as modules when all the filesystems are.
config FS_ENCRYPTION_ALGS
	tristate
	select CRYPTO_AES
	select CRYPTO_CBC
	select CRYPTO_ECB
	select CRYPTO_XTS
	select CRYPTO_CTS
	select CRYPTO_SHA512
	select CRYPTO_HMAC

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ