linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] usb: phy: tegra: Use u32 for hardware register variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191223145311.GA9183@nuc8i5>
Date:   Mon, 23 Dec 2019 22:53:11 +0800
From:   Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@....com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] usb: phy: tegra: Use u32 for hardware register
 variables

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:48:09AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 22.12.2019 16:24, Dejin Zheng пишет:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:52:36AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> There is a mix of u32/ULONG usage in the driver's code. Let's switch to
> >> u32 uniformly, for consistency.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
> >>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c
> >> index d5739b6e0b6c..551c94e3877a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c
> >> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static inline struct tegra_usb_phy *to_tegra_usb_phy(struct usb_phy *u_phy)
> >>  static void set_pts(struct tegra_usb_phy *phy, u8 pts_val)
> >>  {
> >>  	void __iomem *base = phy->regs;
> >> -	unsigned long val;
> >> +	u32 val;
> >>  
> >>  	if (phy->soc_config->has_hostpc) {
> >>  		val = readl_relaxed(base + TEGRA_USB_HOSTPC1_DEVLC);
> >> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static void set_pts(struct tegra_usb_phy *phy, u8 pts_val)
> >>  static void set_phcd(struct tegra_usb_phy *phy, bool enable)
> >>  {
> >>  	void __iomem *base = phy->regs;
> >> -	unsigned long val;
> >> +	u32 val;
> >>  
> >>  	if (phy->soc_config->has_hostpc) {
> >>  		val = readl_relaxed(base + TEGRA_USB_HOSTPC1_DEVLC);
> >> @@ -320,7 +320,8 @@ static int utmip_pad_power_on(struct tegra_usb_phy *phy)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct tegra_utmip_config *config = phy->config;
> >>  	void __iomem *base = phy->pad_regs;
> >> -	unsigned long val, flags;
> >> +	unsigned long flags;
> >> +	u32 val;
> > Why are you still using unsigned long here?
> 
> Please take a look at [1][2], the types are matching callees.
> 
> [1]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5-rc2/source/include/linux/spinlock.h#L249
> 
> [2]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5-rc2/source/include/asm-generic/io.h#L297

Okay, thanks for your explanation.

Dejin