[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae2945f0-c3ff-7d78-4947-f87c3026100e@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 08:15:00 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] io-wq: kill cpu hog worker
On 12/22/19 7:41 PM, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
> Reschedule the current IO worker if it is becoming a cpu hog.
Might make more sense to put this a bit earlier, to avoid the
awkward lock juggle. In theory it shouldn't make a difference
if we do it _before_ doing new work, or _after_ doing work. We
should only be rescheduling if it's running for quite a while.
How about putting it after the flushing of signals instead?
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists