[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191223154538.74a76f94@archlinux>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 15:45:38 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
<vkoul@...nel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: stm32-dfsdm: Use dma_request_chan() instead
dma_request_slave_channel()
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:52:21 +0200
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com> wrote:
> dma_request_slave_channel() is a wrapper on top of dma_request_chan()
> eating up the error code.
>
> By using dma_request_chan() directly the driver can support deferred
> probing against DMA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
I don't think this one goes far enough.
One of the paths does:
/* Optionally request DMA */
if (stm32_dfsdm_dma_request(indio_dev)) {
dev_dbg(&indio_dev->dev, "No DMA support\n");
return 0;
}
That needs specific handling for deferred probing.
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> index e493242c266e..3aac1a21f9d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> @@ -1383,9 +1383,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_dma_request(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> struct stm32_dfsdm_adc *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> - adc->dma_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(&indio_dev->dev, "rx");
> - if (!adc->dma_chan)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + adc->dma_chan = dma_request_chan(&indio_dev->dev, "rx");
> + if (IS_ERR(adc->dma_chan))
> + return PTR_ERR(adc->dma_chan);
>
> adc->rx_buf = dma_alloc_coherent(adc->dma_chan->device->dev,
> DFSDM_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists