linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 03/17] KVM: X86: Don't track dirty for KVM_SET_[TSS_ADDR|IDENTITY_MAP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Dec 2019 18:59:01 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 03/17] KVM: X86: Don't track dirty for
 KVM_SET_[TSS_ADDR|IDENTITY_MAP_ADDR]

On 23/12/19 18:27, Peter Xu wrote:
> Yes.  Though it is a bit tricky in that then we'll also need to make
> sure to take slots_lock or srcu to protect that hva (say, we must drop
> that hva reference before we release the locks, otherwise the hva
> could gone under us, iiuc).

Yes, kvm->slots_lock is taken by x86_set_memory_region.  We need to move
that to the callers, of which several are already taking the lock (all
except vmx_set_tss_addr and kvm_arch_destroy_vm).

Paolo

> So if we want to do that we'd better
> comment on that hva value very explicitly, just in case some future
> callers of __x86_set_memory_region could cache it somewhere.