[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191223182446.GA28321@ziepe.ca>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 14:24:46 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
"Linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/25] mm/gup: track dma-pinned pages: FOLL_PIN
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:32:13PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > There's already a limit, it's just a much larger one. :) What does "no limit"
> > > really mean, numerically, to you in this case?
> >
> > I guess I mean 'hidden limit' - hitting the limit and failing would
> > be managable.
> >
> > I think 7 is probably too low though, but we are not using 1GB huge
> > pages, only 2M..
>
> What about RDMA to 1GB-hugetlbfs and 1GB-device-dax mappings?
I don't think the failing testing is doing that.
It is also less likely that 1GB regions will need multi-mapping, IMHO.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists