[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191223231638.cbewgy7lfx74txde@box>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 02:16:38 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Willhalm, Thomas" <thomas.willhalm@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Bruggeman, Otto G" <otto.g.bruggeman@...el.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix two above-47bit hint address vs. THP bugs
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 02:25:52PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:25:46 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
>
> > The two get_unmapped_area() implementations have to be fixed to provide
> > THP-friendly mappings if above-47bit hint address is specified.
> >
>
> Do we need a cc:stable for these?
Yes, please. Otherwise users that use above-47bit hint would regress on
number of PMD-mapped THPs.
But it's not urgent. It's okay to cook it up in linux-next for a while.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists