[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191224114518.GA13883@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:45:18 +0100
From: Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt: bindings: lm3692x: Document new properties
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 08:15:15PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2019-12-16 13:28:05, Guido Günther wrote:
> > We allow configuration of brightness mode and over voltage
> > protection.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3692x.txt
> > @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ Required properties:
> > Optional properties:
> > - enable-gpios : gpio pin to enable/disable the device.
> > - vled-supply : LED supply
> > + - ti,brightness-mapping-exponential: Whether to use exponential
> > + brightness mapping
> > + - ti,overvoltage-volts: Overvoltage protection in Volts, can
> > + be 0 (unprotected), 21, 25 or 29V
> >
>
> We usually use microvolts in various device tree properties...
Make sense.
> Exponential mapping s not really property of the hardware, is it? Does
> it belong here or somewhere in the backlight binding?
I opted for having it with the hardware since the property can't be
configured per backlight led strip individually.
Cheers,
-- Guido
> Best regards,
> Pavel
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists