linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: refcount bug in cdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <93629f93-d20e-fa56-b021-3a90b355e6ec@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Dec 2019 18:29:18 +0530
From:   Prateek Sood <prsood@...eaurora.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+82defefbbd8527e1c2cb@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        hdanton@...a.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: refcount bug in cdev_get

Hi Will,

I am facing same issue while syzkaller fault injection code is causing

failure in filp->f_op->open() from chrdev_open().

I believe we need to rely on refcount as cdev_lock() is not sufficient

in this case.

Patch mentioned in 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/syzkaller-bugs/PnQNxBrWv_8/X1ygj8d8DgAJ

seems good.


Please share your opinion the same.


Regards

Prateek



On 12/19/2019 5:29 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 07:20:26PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 05:08:55PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 11:44:45AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 01:31:48PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>> This code hasn't changed in 15+ years, what suddenly changed that causes
>>>>> problems here?
>>>> I suppose one thing to consider is that the refcount code is relatively new,
>>>> so it could be that the actual use-after-free is extremely rare, but we're
>>>> now seeing that it's at least potentially an issue.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>> FWIW, I added some mdelay()s to make this race more likely, and I can now
>>> trigger it reasonably reliably. See below.
>>>
>>> --->8
>>>
>>> [   89.512353] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [   89.513350] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
>>> [   89.513977] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6385 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0x6d/0xf0
> [...]
>
>> No hint as to _where_ you put the mdelay()?  :)
> I threw it in the release function to maximise the period where the refcount
> is 0 but the inode 'i_cdev' pointer is non-NULL. I also hacked chrdev_open()
> so that the fops->open() call appears to fail most of the time (I guess
> syzkaller uses error injection to do something similar). Nasty hack below.
>
> I'll send a patch, given that I've managed to "reproduce" this.
>
> Will
>
> --->8
>
> diff --git a/fs/char_dev.c b/fs/char_dev.c
> index 00dfe17871ac..e2e48fcd0435 100644
> --- a/fs/char_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/char_dev.c
> @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static int chrdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>   	const struct file_operations *fops;
>   	struct cdev *p;
>   	struct cdev *new = NULL;
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	int ret = 0, first = 0;
>   
>   	spin_lock(&cdev_lock);
>   	p = inode->i_cdev;
> @@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ static int chrdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>   			inode->i_cdev = p = new;
>   			list_add(&inode->i_devices, &p->list);
>   			new = NULL;
> +			first = 1;
>   		} else if (!cdev_get(p))
>   			ret = -ENXIO;
>   	} else if (!cdev_get(p))
> @@ -411,6 +412,10 @@ static int chrdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>   
>   	replace_fops(filp, fops);
>   	if (filp->f_op->open) {
> +		if (first && (get_cycles() & 0x3)) {
> +			ret = -EINTR;
> +			goto out_cdev_put;
> +		}
>   		ret = filp->f_op->open(inode, filp);
>   		if (ret)
>   			goto out_cdev_put;
> @@ -594,12 +599,14 @@ void cdev_del(struct cdev *p)
>   	kobject_put(&p->kobj);
>   }
>   
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>   
>   static void cdev_default_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>   {
>   	struct cdev *p = container_of(kobj, struct cdev, kobj);
>   	struct kobject *parent = kobj->parent;
>   
> +	mdelay(50);
>   	cdev_purge(p);
>   	kobject_put(parent);
>   }

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation
Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project