[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191225113932.GD18098@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 12:39:32 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: core/urgent] rseq: Reject unknown flags on rseq unregister
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 10:38:53AM -0000, tip-bot2 for Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> The following commit has been merged into the core/urgent branch of tip:
>
> Commit-ID: 66528a4575eee9f5a5270219894ab6178f146e84
> Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/66528a4575eee9f5a5270219894ab6178f146e84
> Author: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> AuthorDate: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:17:11 -05:00
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitterDate: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 10:41:20 +01:00
>
> rseq: Reject unknown flags on rseq unregister
>
> It is preferrable to reject unknown flags within rseq unregistration
> rather than to ignore them. It is an oversight caused by the fact that
> the check for unknown flags is after the rseq unregister flag check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191211161713.4490-2-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> ---
> kernel/rseq.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rseq.c b/kernel/rseq.c
> index 27c48eb..a4f86a9 100644
> --- a/kernel/rseq.c
> +++ b/kernel/rseq.c
> @@ -310,6 +310,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(rseq, struct rseq __user *, rseq, u32, rseq_len,
> int ret;
>
> if (flags & RSEQ_FLAG_UNREGISTER) {
> + if (flags & ~RSEQ_FLAG_UNREGISTER)
> + return -EINVAL;
> /* Unregister rseq for current thread. */
> if (current->rseq != rseq || !current->rseq)
> return -EINVAL;
Cc: stable perhaps?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists