[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191225061501.13587-1-ghe@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 06:15:24 +0000
From: Gang He <GHe@...e.com>
To: "mark@...heh.com" <mark@...heh.com>,
"jlbec@...lplan.org" <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
"joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com" <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
CC: Gang He <GHe@...e.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: fix the crash due to call ocfs2_get_dlm_debug once
less
Because ocfs2_get_dlm_debug() function is called once less here,
ocfs2 file system will trigger the system crash, usually after
ocfs2 file system is unmounted.
this system crash is caused by a generic memory corruption, these
crash backtraces are not always the same, for exapmle,
[ 4106.597432] ocfs2: Unmounting device (253,16) on (node 172167785)
[ 4116.230719] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[ 4116.230731] CPU: 3 PID: 14107 Comm: fence_legacy Kdump:
[ 4116.230737] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
[ 4116.230772] RIP: 0010:__kmalloc+0xa5/0x2a0
[ 4116.230778] Code: 00 00 4d 8b 07 65 4d 8b
[ 4116.230785] RSP: 0018:ffffaa1fc094bbe8 EFLAGS: 00010286
[ 4116.230790] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: d310a8800d7a3faf RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 4116.230794] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000dc0 RDI: ffff96e68fc036c0
[ 4116.230798] RBP: d310a8800d7a3faf R08: ffff96e6ffdb10a0 R09: 00000000752e7079
[ 4116.230802] R10: 000000000001c513 R11: 0000000004091041 R12: 0000000000000dc0
[ 4116.230806] R13: 0000000000000039 R14: ffff96e68fc036c0 R15: ffff96e68fc036c0
[ 4116.230811] FS: 00007f699dfba540(0000) GS:ffff96e6ffd80000(0000) knlGS:00000
[ 4116.230815] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 4116.230819] CR2: 000055f3a9d9b768 CR3: 000000002cd1c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[ 4116.230833] Call Trace:
[ 4116.230898] ? ext4_htree_store_dirent+0x35/0x100 [ext4]
[ 4116.230924] ext4_htree_store_dirent+0x35/0x100 [ext4]
[ 4116.230957] htree_dirblock_to_tree+0xea/0x290 [ext4]
[ 4116.230989] ext4_htree_fill_tree+0x1c1/0x2d0 [ext4]
[ 4116.231027] ext4_readdir+0x67c/0x9d0 [ext4]
[ 4116.231040] iterate_dir+0x8d/0x1a0
[ 4116.231056] __x64_sys_getdents+0xab/0x130
[ 4116.231063] ? iterate_dir+0x1a0/0x1a0
[ 4116.231076] ? do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1f0
[ 4116.231080] ? __ia32_sys_getdents+0x130/0x130
[ 4116.231086] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1f0
[ 4116.231151] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 4116.231168] RIP: 0033:0x7f699d33a9fb
This regression problem was introduced by commit e581595ea29c ("ocfs:
no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions").
Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@...e.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
index 1c4c51f3df60..cda1027d0819 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
@@ -3282,6 +3282,7 @@ static void ocfs2_dlm_init_debug(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
debugfs_create_u32("locking_filter", 0600, osb->osb_debug_root,
&dlm_debug->d_filter_secs);
+ ocfs2_get_dlm_debug(dlm_debug);
}
static void ocfs2_dlm_shutdown_debug(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
--
2.12.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists