[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d97b91ae4547e5b6e433891446a68545@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 16:21:25 +0800
From: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
avri.altman@....com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kuohong.wang@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com,
chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com, andy.teng@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: unify scsi_block_requests usage
On 2019-12-24 21:01, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Currently UFS driver has ufshcd_scsi_block_requests() with
> reference counter mechanism to avoid possible racing of blocking and
> unblocking requests flow. Unify all users in UFS driver to use the
> same function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index ed02a70..b6b9665 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -5177,7 +5177,7 @@ static void
> ufshcd_exception_event_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> hba = container_of(work, struct ufs_hba, eeh_work);
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev);
> - scsi_block_requests(hba->host);
> + ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba);
> err = ufshcd_get_ee_status(hba, &status);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to get exception status %d\n",
> @@ -5191,7 +5191,7 @@ static void
> ufshcd_exception_event_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> ufshcd_bkops_exception_event_handler(hba);
>
> out:
> - scsi_unblock_requests(hba->host);
> + ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba);
> pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev);
> return;
> }
Reviewed-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists