linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] interconnect: qcom: sdm845: Split qnodes into their respective NoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:48:03 -0700
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     David Dai <daidavid1@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     georgi.djakov@...aro.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        evgreen@...gle.com, sboyd@...nel.org, ilina@...eaurora.org,
        seansw@....qualcomm.com, elder@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] interconnect: qcom: sdm845: Split qnodes into
 their respective NoCs

On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 09:58:44PM -0800, David Dai wrote:
> In order to better represent the hardware and its different Network-On-Chip
> devices, split the sdm845 provider driver into NoC specific providers.
> Remove duplicate functionality already provided by the icc rpmh and
> bcm voter drivers to calculate and commit bandwidth requests to hardware.
 
This breaks backwards compatibility. Is that okay for all 845 users?

> Signed-off-by: David Dai <daidavid1@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/interconnect/qcom/sdm845.c             | 1122 ++++++++++--------------
>  include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm845.h |  263 +++---
>  2 files changed, 606 insertions(+), 779 deletions(-)