lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41175786-8a02-62e0-fc79-955ec0e74aeb@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 25 Dec 2019 20:39:31 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>, xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com,
        Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: make the io_ticks counter more accurate

On 12/25/19 8:10 PM, Wen Yang wrote:
> Instead of the jiffies, we should update the io_ticks counter
> with the passed in parameter 'now'.

I'm still missing some justification for this. What exactly is this
patch trying to solve or improve? Your commit message says "we should",
but why?

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ